AIA Report on Integrated Practice| Thom Mayne and Chuck Eastman
Thom Mayne in his writing offers
the reader his wisdom and opinion on BIM and architecture, his main thesis that
we in the field of architecture must adapt to new technologies or perish. To adapt,
Mayne advises the field should place more emphasis on making and the idea of no longer working in 2D but 3D instead. “The most important thing is to
understand that it isn’t just about the nature of how we put together our
packages. It has to do with a complete rethinking of our work.” To understand the new technology of BIM and its implications
Mayne advises gestalt.
Definition of GESTALT: a structure, configuration, or pattern of physical, biological, or psychological phenomena so integrated as to constitute a functional unit with properties not derivable by summation of its parts
Origin of GESTALT: German, literally, shape, form (Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition)
Definition of GESTALT: a structure, configuration, or pattern of physical, biological, or psychological phenomena so integrated as to constitute a functional unit with properties not derivable by summation of its parts
Origin of GESTALT: German, literally, shape, form (Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition)
Chuck
Eastman similarly advocates BIM and the necessity of change in the field of
architecture. While Mayne advises gestalt, Eastman advises understanding the
foundation of BIM: Parametric modeling.
Parametric modeling: The basic
idea that 2D or 3D solid object shapes can be defined according to parameters, some
of which are user-defined values and others relative to other shapes.
Based on these writings and my
experience with both BIM programs as well as Parametric modeling studies, it is
my opinion that for BIM to work it relies on a system of defined limits and conditions
that if not met fails. Each object therefore relies on rules to define itself,
and as such it behaves a certain way based on the rules/limitations we the designer
place on it. Understanding this changes not only the way one chooses to design
but also how one communicates. Parametrics
and BIM also allows for the exploration of systems from other fields of
structure and fabrication that could expand architectural design. Eastman hypothesizes that this expansion of
BIM could lead to the creating of new design styles in architecture.
In the end the writings of Mayne and
Eastman for me pose this challenge: in a world of expanding technology what is
the reality of architecture and what it is and how it performs in modern
society?
No comments:
Post a Comment